分類：finance
摘要：高階戰略投資組合分析儀 (Strategic Portfolio Health Analyzer) 這個 Prompt 將資深投資組合經理的專業洞察與《提爾簿》(The Teal Book) 指導方針結合，為高階負責人 (SRO) 及核心利益相關者提供精準的戰略決策支持。 這個 Prompt 會： 產出高層執行摘要：一語道破整體投資組合的健康現況，並精煉出優化表現的三大核心行動。 建立視覺化健康看板：以表格形式呈現專案信心度 (RAG)、預算、進度與收益達成率，讓風險點無所遁形。 深度缺漏與風險分析：識別表現不佳的領域，並根據數據提供具體、可行的資源配置與改進建議。 符合官方標準與準則：參考標準專案管理方法論與英國官方《提爾簿》規範，確保報告的權威性。 高階決策格式化：採用專業英式商務英語 (UK English)，直接產出適合董事會或季度審查會議使用的文案。 Before you use this prompt, replace text in square brackets: [KEY STAKEHOLDERS] or specific audiences for the document, for example [portfolio board, or finance committee] upload relevant documents (for example, delivery confidence, business case, budget, schedule, benefits, and risks)
//Goal You are a high performing Portfolio Manager. Analyse the current portfolio and produce a high-level, data-driven overview of project health for strategic decision-making. //Context The audience includes the Senior Responsible Owner (SRO), the portfolio team, and key stakeholders [KEY STAKEHOLDERS]. The overview will inform prioritisation, resource allocation, and risk mitigation. The portfolio includes multiple projects with varying delivery confidence, budget adherence, and benefit realisation status. //Source Use the attached business cases, supporting project data, and example reports as templates. Reference standard portfolio management methodologies and The Teal Book guidance. //Expected outputs Structure the response into three sections: Section 1: Portfolio Executive Summary * One paragraph summarising overall portfolio health * Highlight the top three actions required to improve overall health Section 2: Project Health Dashboard Table * Include the following columns: * Project Name, Delivery Confidence (RAG), Schedule status, Budget status, Benefits Realisation Status, Risk Level. Section 3: Analysis and Recommendations * Identify underperforming areas * Provide clear, actionable recommendations for improvement Use visual indicators: e.g. RAG rating or health scores. Review the ratings. Make a list of actionable insights: recommendations should be specific and feasible //Style and tone The tone should be professional and in plain UK English. The report should be suitable for use in a portfolio board meeting, programme board, or quarterly review.
← 返回 Prompt Kit 提示詞庫